Picking a style
Choosing the right icon style is an art. Do you need bold impact, subtle minimalism, or retro charm? This guide explores the full spectrum of icon styles—from line to pixel—highlighting their strengths, drawbacks, and ideal use cases.
—
Skeuomorphic Icons
A style that could make a comeback—Skeuomorphic icons mimic real-world objects using textures, shadows, and depth, creating a tactile and realistic feel. Designed to make digital interactions intuitive, they reference physical counterparts, offering a sense of comfort in digital experiences.

Mac OSX Leopard icons by Apple.
Pros
• Intuitive and relatable, especially for first-time users.
• Highly engaging with detailed, realistic designs.
• Could make a comeback when users are bored of minimalism.
Cons
• Can feel outdated in modern interfaces.
• Heavier file sizes and more complex to design.
• Less versatile for scalable design systems.
Best for
• App icons.
• Editorial or decorative illustrations.
• Projects where realism and familiarity are key.
—
Isometric Icons
A geometric style with depth—Crafted with a consistent 30° angle, these icons offer depth and geometric precision, creating a structured and technical visual style.

Isometric icons by Timo Kuilder.
Pros
• Visually dynamic and engaging.
• Great for illustrating complex processes or systems.
• Adds personality and uniqueness to interfaces.
Cons
• More complex and time-consuming to design.
• Can be too detailed for small UI elements.
Best for
• SaaS dashboards with complex data visualization.
• Marketing visuals and presentations.
• llustrative elements.
—
Illustrative icons
Minimalism meets artistic mood—Close to illustrations, they retain the clarity of iconic design but add a hand-crafted, artistic touch with organic lines and subtle textures. Balancing minimalism and creativity, they feel approachable while staying clear and functional.

Tic Toc Icon Set by Leo Rheeder.
Pros
• Human and artistic: Adds a crafted, personal feel to digital interfaces.
• Visually distinctive in a design space dominated by minimalism.
Cons
• More Time-Consuming to Design: Requires attention to detail and artistry.
• Inconsistent in Overly Minimal Interfaces: May feel out of place in ultra-strict, minimal systems.
Best For
• Branding Elements for brands that value craftsmanship and artistic expression.
• Presentation Graphic with storytelling.
• Marketing Campaigns: Adds an emotional element to visuals.
—
Hand-drawn icons
Hand-drawn icons bring a playful, personal touch to projects with their organic lines and expressive style. Mimicking real pen or marker strokes, they feature charming details—like this winking laptop below—that give them a casual, friendly feel. Their simplified forms keep things clear and bold, making them easy to read while adding creativity to any project.

Freehand icons by Streamline.
Pros
Approachable & friendly: Great for give a casual style to your project.
Unique personality: Helps brands stand out and feel more human.
Visual storytelling: The hand-drawn style feel expressive and alive, ideal for engaging storytelling.
Cons
Less formal: Not suitable for highly professional or conservative contexts (e.g., legal, finance).
Lower scalability: Some fine details may not scale down as cleanly as minimal grid-based icons.
Not always legible: The loose style can reduce clarity for users who need easily recognizable visuals.
Best for
Onboarding screens: Makes apps feel warm and easy to start using.
Error pages (404s, downtime): Lightens frustration with playful visuals.
Presentation decks & infographics: Adds charm and energy to content.
Creative blogs and websites: Matches the playful tone of creators and unique brands.
Kids’ apps, lifestyle products: Perfect for casual and youth-focused experiences.
—
Brutal icons
Brutal icons embrace bold, almost aggressive design. Inspired by brutalist architecture, they feature heavy strokes, sharp geometry, and high contrast to make a confident statement. Deliberately raw and minimal, this style favors strength and precision over softness—ideal for bold, tech-driven interfaces.

Material Pro icons by Streamline. An expanded icon set built on Google’s Material Design guidelines — improved, and packed with additional icons.
Pros
High visual impact: Strong contrast and thick lines make them attention-grabbing.
Consistent style: Their structure, built on primitive geometric shapes, gives the set a clean and unified appearance.
Modern & trendy: Fits well with brutalist web design, minimalist branding, and innovative tech products.
Iconic feel: Each shape feels memorable due to its bold, geometric build.
Cons
Lacks warmth: The hard-edged style can feel cold, rigid, or overly technical.
Less detail: Sacrifices expressive or illustrative qualities in favor of simplicity.
May not suit all brands: Too harsh for friendly, human-centered usage.
—
Let's remix them all!
There are no strict rules when it comes to icon styles—you can mix different influences to create something uniquely yours. In fact, developing a distinctive style with bold visual choices is often the best way to stand out in a crowded brand space. Here are a few examples of creative and unconventional uses of style:
Flat style + hand-drawn

Christmas and winter illustrative icons by Elmira Gokoryan.
Line + Color + Isometric perspective view

Investment and trading spot icons by Neha Dinesh.
Line + Solid + Perspective, with a duotone color scheme

Illustrated Icons by Josh Warren
Flat + Brutalist icons

UMAUMA Icons by Laura Nunes.
Line, with an hand-drawn touch
